EDC

In defence of the EDC

National Post
June 6, 2000

Patrick J. Lavelle, chairman of the board of the Export Development Corporation, responds to Patricia Adams.


Please see the original article The secret of EDC’s ‘success’.

Responding to a critical Post article, EDC chairman Patrick Lavelle
says the Crown export corp is considered a model for other countries,
and is moving to address its shortcomings.

In early May, at
the invitation of the president and CEO of Ex-Im Bank of the United
States, I attended a conference of trade finance experts from around
the world who gathered in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the 65th
anniversary of the founding of that historic organization.

What struck me about the experience was that Canada’s Export
Development Corp. was very much on the minds of many of the featured
speakers and participants. This attention, it turned out, was largely a
tribute to EDC’s outstanding success. While it was Ex-Im’s birthday, a
lot of attention went to how Ex-Im could be more like EDC.

This struck me curious amid the constant din of the Ottawa Citizen and
the National Post, who seem determined to turn EDC into the U.S. Ex-Im
Bank, a money-losing agency that is a lender of last resort and a
non-competitive trade component of the U.S. government.

While the focus was on Ex-Im Bank, many of the participants at the
conference were aware of the domestic criticism of EDC on
environmental, disclosure and human rights issues. They were mystified
as to why Canadian critics seemed intent on discrediting an agency that
is considered a model for other export credit agencies around the
world.

I am now in my third year as chairman of EDC. Prior to this I served as
chairman of the Business Development Bank of Canada during a period
when BDC was transformed from a money-losing lender of last resort into
a profitable agency of change for small and emerging businesses. The
EDC I knew then was already ahead of the curve in responding to the
commercial market, and has progressed steadily since then into a
world-leading export-financing agency.

During the past three years, the agency has been under intense public
and parliamentary scrutiny. The EDC legislation passed in 1993 provided
for a third-party review (starting in 1998), which was conducted by the
law firm Gowling, Strathy & Henderson.

The following year, the Auditor-General undertook a special review of
EDC, giving it a clean bill of health. Most recently, both the House of
Commons and the Senate held public parliamentary hearings on the EDC
mandate.

The legislative review found much to praise about EDC’s operations. It
also made certain suggestions for reform that were fair and
understandable, particularly on environmental, disclosure and human
rights issues. All these issues were already on the EDC drawing board,
and significant progress has already been achieved.

While the review was in progress, certain media and NGOs initiated a
barrage of EDC criticism that has been distorted, unfair and smacking
of malice. EDC welcomes a dialogue with Canadians as long as the
critics look at both sides of the issues before rushing to judgment.

EDC is a Crown Corporation, wholly owned by the government of Canada.
Its capital base is funded by taxpayers, it pays no taxes, and it
borrows on the power of the federal government. On these issues there
is no dispute. The EDC has never lost money in its 56 years of
operation. It has retained earnings of close to $1-billion, equal to
the government’s original contribution, and has filled a gap in the
market in trade finance.

EDC has developed an exceptional presence globally in trade finance,
has developed a unique incentive-oriented culture within a government
environment, and has consistently been driven to change and adapt by
the global competitive pressures facing Canada’s exporters. It has also
worked to expand its customer base aggressively to include Canadian
small and medium-sized businesses.

No organization is perfect, and EDC is no exception. It is useful for
the public to know what steps have been taken to respond to the critics
and how the organization continues to adapt to Canadian and global
pressures.

When I became chairman in January, 1998, management had already
initiated a series of discussions with exporters, in conjunction with a
third-party team of environmental experts, to develop an environmental
framework for EDC. The board of directors eventually approved this
framework in the spring of 1999. It is posted on EDC’s Web site, and
represents a first step in bringing our standards up to a level that
not only will satisfy all our critics, but also will respond to the
real problems we face in a responsible and commercially viable manner.

On disclosure, the EDC has been a leader among government agencies in
providing taxpayers with full financial accountability that closely
mirrors private-sector organizations that conform to the requirements
of the Ontario Securities Commission or the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Auditor-General consistently recognizes EDC’s
efforts in this respect. The board is currently reviewing a new
disclosure framework that will balance the public’s right to know and
the customer’s need to protect its competitiveness.

On the human rights issue, I am somewhat baffled by the critics. We
clearly take our lead from the government and respond according to the
guidelines given to us by the Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade. As a board, we are clearly aware of the importance
the government attaches to human rights issues, but nonetheless, we are
committed to ensuring our response to government directives in this
area is fully taken into account by the board and management.

The governance issues at EDC have received less attention. The 1999
annual report devotes five pages to our progress in implementing
governance guidelines for Crown corporations issued by Treasury Board
and reflective of the changes implemented after the Dey Report on
corporate governance in the private sector.

For my part, I would like to set the record straight on some issues
regarding EDC’s board of directors. All the directors are appointed by
the shareholder (similar to the private sector) and serve three-year
terms. They must comply with rigid conflict-of-interest guidelines and
annually sign a Code of Conduct that was introduced by the board in
late 1998. These guidelines are at the leading edge in the public
sector, and far outstrip anything I have encountered in the private
sector.

Most observers of EDC tend to forget that it is both a Crown
corporation and a financial institution, and is therefore driven by
both the government and its 5,000-plus customers. The corporation must
walk a fine line between its public policy mandate and commercial
objectives. On the one hand, we owe appropriate disclosure to the
taxpayers; on the other, EDC’s clients want private sector-type respect
for client commercial confidentiality. We are attempting to achieve
this balance without compromising either.

The board has enormous fiduciary responsibilities commensurate with the
size of the organization (more than 800 employees), business volume
(exceeding $40-billion) and EDC assets (more than $19-billion). In a
manner of speaking, this is a Fortune 500-type organization, and in the
interest of taxpayers (the real shareholders), it is run like one,
ensuring that best practices are followed in operations, risk
management and human resource development. This is yet another side of
a complex organization that the public may not be aware of.

As I have already indicated, we welcome public dialogue as long as
EDC’s actions are judged on full and fair disclosure of the facts
within the proper context. The public deserves nothing less.

Patrick J. Lavelle is chairman of the board of the Export Development Corp.

 

Categories: EDC, Export Credit, News

Tagged as: ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s