Seismic activity started to rise just as two giant reservoirs on the upper Yangtze were being filled with water. Nature magazine reports on the latest findings by Chinese geologist Fan Xiao, published by Probe International, on the link between mega-dams and seismic activity in China’s southwestern region.
By Jane Qiu, published by Nature magazine on September 10, 2014
Ever since August 3, when an earthquake in southwestern China killed more than 600 people, the Chinese media and blogosphere have buzzed with speculation that the magnitude-6.5 tremor was linked to the filling of two gigantic reservoirs along the upper Yangtze river. Now, a geologist says that he has data to support the possible link.
On August 28, Fan Xiao, an engineer at the Sichuan Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources in Chengdu, reported a rough correlation between the timing of the filling of the reservoirs and a rise in seismic activity in the surrounding region.
Posted on a website run by Probe International, a non-profit organization that reports on China’s large-scale water projects, Fan’s analysis is based on crude seismic data — the only sort that are publicly available — so the link is tentative. But “it’s an important possibility,” says Hu Xian-ming, a geophysicist at the Sichuan Earthquake Administration in Chengdu. “There are serious concerns for deadly quakes in the future.”
Criss-crossed by active faults, the upper Yangtze region is seeing a boom in dam-building for the [next] generation of hydropower. But when water flows quickly into the resulting reservoirs, it can change the stress on faults deep underground, either from the sheer weight of the water, or when water infiltrates the rocks through cracks and pores. These events might accelerate a fault’s natural ‘seismic clock’, hastening an earthquake that is already building, or increase the chance of one occurring at all.
Debate is already raging about whether the 2008 quake in Wenchuan county, which killed at least 70,000 people (see Nature 459, 153–157; 2009) was linked to the filling of Zipingpu reservoir in Sichuan province. Fan was one of the first to raise the possibility, and his suggestion was followed up by other researchers who have reported, for instance, that the reservoir might have brought forward the occurrence of the quake by tens to hundreds of years (S. Ge et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L20315; 2009).
After the 3 August quake in Ludian county, discussion turned to two newly created reservoirs, the nearest of which, Xiluodu, is 40 kilometres from the epicentre (see ‘Of dams and quakes’).
On the basis of seismic readings taken between January 2010 and July 2014, Fan reports that small quakes became more frequent in late 2012 and continued until the end of the period. That heightened activity roughly correlates with the reservoirs being filled. The areas most affected cluster at three locations: one near each reservoir, and a third close to a fault whose rupture led to the latest quake. “The study has its limitations,” says Fan, “but it does ring an alarm bell of increasing reservoir-triggered quakes in the region.”
A possible trend
His report also flags […] two smaller earthquakes that hit the county of Yongshan in April and August and were caused by faults directly below the Xiluodu reservoir. Xu Xi-wei, deputy director of the China Earthquake Administration’s Institute of Geology in Beijing, agrees that these two tremors were “most likely triggered by Xiluodu”. The link between the Ludian quake and the reservoirs is less convincing, he says, because the epicentre is too distant and the initial rupture happened about 12 kilometres down, too deep for water to reach.
However, Christian Klose, a geologist at Think Geohazards, a consultancy firm in Bronxville, New York, who studied the Wenchuan quake, says that he finds the link to the Ludian quake plausible. “You don’t need water migrating into rocks to cause quakes,” he says. “The sheer weight of a massive reservoir could bend [the] Earth’s crust and rupture a critically stressed fault.”
Researchers including Hu are calling for the dissemination of more sensitive seismic data from the dense network of stations in the reservoir areas, which are tightly controlled by hydropower companies. “This would make more detailed analyses possible,” he says. Fan’s analysis was based on data from seismic stations controlled by the regional government, which are sparse and have less sensitive equipment.
With dozens more dams planned or under construction for the upper Yangtze, “the issue is more pressing than ever,” says Fan. Whether or not the Ludian quake was triggered by reservoir-filling, it would be prudent to prepare, says Xu. “Buildings in reservoir areas must be reinforced to fend off future quakes.”
The original version of this report is available here at the publisher’s website
For the report by Fan Xiao, see: Impoundment of two mega-dams on China’s Jinsha River triggers earthquake in Ludian
Yunnan earthquake raises fears on hydropower projects
Yunnan earthquake linked to dam-building, says Chinese geologist
Impoundment of Jinping-I Dam on Yangtze tributary triggers quakes
On alert: RIS risk amid rash of earthquakes in China’s Sichuan-Yunnan region
Deadly earthquake in China may be aftershock of 2008 Wenchuan quake
Analysis of 5.1M earthquake in Badong County, Hubei, December 16, 2013
Leave a Reply