REVIEW of “Odious debts: the terms of the debate” by Jeff King

(November 2, 2007) This is Jeff King’s second major work on the doctrine of odious debts, the first being the landmark study he produced with Ashfaq Khalfan and Bryan Thomas on behalf of the Centre for International Sustainable Development Law at McGill University in 2001 (and finalized in 2003). Like the first, this one is full of important legal history and arguments that odious debt advocates will want to know.

World Bank’s odious debts paper needs review, say NGOs

(October 26, 2007) The World Bank should conduct a "full, independent peer review" on the odious debts discussion paper it released last month, say an alliance of civil society NGOs that includes Eurodad and the Jubilee Debt Campaign. The alliance, in a letter sent to the bank in early October, call the paper "far below what is needed" and argue not only that the paper is one-sided, but that it is missing significant sources and arguments. It further states that the paper is "largely dismissive of the concept of odious debt" and "omits important cases where the concept has been recognized."

Legal scholars set to change the world

(October 20, 2007) In November 2004, Paris Club creditors canceled an unprecedented 80% of the debts they had lent to the regime of Saddam Hussein, catapulting the development of the Doctrine of Odious Debts forward. Now, legal scholars are identifying the many legal principles and precedents supporting lender liability and ensuring that odious debts are never created again.

REVIEW The dilemma of odious debts

(October 20, 2007) If you haven’t read this paper (it’s been circulating on the Internet for some months and is posted here in abstract) then you’re in for a treat. Entertaining, clear and compelling, “The Dilemma of Odious Debts” is an unusual entry to the canon because the authors argue that while challenging odious debts under public international law is most likely hopeless, resorting to private domestic law is very hopeful.

China counts cost of Three Gorges Dam

(October 19, 2007) China’s official news agency Xinhua reported last month that disaster could strike the Three Gorges dam region unless key problems — including landslides and bank erosion — are solved. Probe International’s executive director, Patricia Adams, and International Fellow, Dai Qing, assess the change in government rhetoric after years of assurances the dam is environmentally benign.

Ecology damage report refuted

(October 19, 2007) A top Three Gorges project planner Thursday refuted media reports that the ecology in the dam area has been damaged, stressing that environmental protection has always been a priority. "While environmental impact is inevitable, we should recognize that the project has brought more ecological benefit than harm," Li Yong’an said, adding that he was surprised to read reports about "played-up" hidden ecological dangers last month.